• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1052 years ago

      i’m going to stop calling it twitter when twitter.com redirects to x.com, and not the other way around

      at that point i would stop talking about it, because X is just too stupid

      • Brudder Aaron
        link
        fedilink
        English
        552 years ago

        His obsession with the letter X is like that middle school kid who used to talk about how many girlfriends he got and how good he is at being a bad ass…

        Basically, he’s a less likeable version of Zane from Hypnospace Outlaw.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. If you want him to fail, help him destroy Twitter’s brand.

      Call it X.

      I has worse brand recognition, terrible brand loyalty, and if only highlights that the product has changed for the worse.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169
    edit-2
    2 years ago
    1. I’m sorry, but due to cultural norms the name Twitter is rooted deep within our modern language.

    2. [PERSUASION] Maybe a free little blue check will do the trick

    3. Or what?

    4. [INTIMIDATION] drop your daughter’s dead name and I’ll drop your site’s.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Narrator: You imagine throwing a burlap sack over his head. His underlings would be extremely displeased with you, but he wouldn’t put up much of a fight himself.

        Narrator: You can think of someone who would be extremely pleased with your offering, however.

        Elon: You’re looking at me funny. Is there something you need?

        1. [THE DARK URGE] Give in to your desires.

        2. [PERSUASION] I have an investment opportunity that I think you would be interested in.

        3. Can I see your wares?

        4. No, nothing. I was just lost in thought.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          You know you’ve played the game too much when you can hear how the Narrator would read those lines.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            And you know you’ve also watched too much Thunderf00t when you can hear how Elon would read his line too…

      • harmonea
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I started a DU playthrough and laughed almost as hard as I alt-F4ed the first time I picked one of those fantasize options and saw what happened. 10/10 addition to the dialogue tree

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        What game has “THE DARK URGE” dialogue options? I was imagining Fallout before, but this makes me think it must be some newer one.

            • Pope-King Joe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              52 years ago

              When you create a character, you have the option to play an Origin Character, who are the other companions in the game like Shadowheart, a custom character with your own backstory, or a Dark Urges character, who is also custom, but has the additional backdrop of having dark impulses, like wanting to murder random characters.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                Don’t forget potentially useless proficiency skills.

                A rogue with wis as a dump stat provably shouldn’t be making too many medicine checks lol.

                Ive only messed with that origin once.

                I’m still exploring builds, not so much because I’m unaware of the RAW stuff, but to see how its implemented in BG3. I haven’t left act one yet, lol.

      • SinkingLotus
        link
        fedilink
        42 years ago

        I very quickly learned not to trust the Dark Urge to stop at imagining the act.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      302 years ago

      *roll a nat 20

      “Get fucked, shitbird. I didn’t buy your bullshit even when people thought you were techno Jesus.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        432 years ago

        I mean…im already a masochist when i fuck so…I…I really don’t know how we got here to be perfectly honest.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        342 years ago

        If I win the Powerball I’ll be able to afford a good Dom.

        Now the real paradox: if I can only cum when billionaires can’t get their way but I’m a billionaire and my mistress denies me orgasm, what happens? Does the universe implode on itself?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        162 years ago

        Nah just donate to charity until you’re well below a billion. Even a hundred million sets me up for life, and it has the added bonus of not being so much that my descendants end up as fucking idiots like Musk.

  • Plap plap 𓁑𓂸
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1262 years ago

    The problem is, is that if you engage with anyone outside of the internet, they have no fucking idea what you’re talking about when you call it “X”.

    It’s so fucking stupid of a name. Even worse than Facebook changing to Meta.

    You can ask people to call it “X” all day, every day, but you can’t just change the name of your brand/product to a single letter, that people use every day for other things, and expect it to work out for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      782 years ago

      Facebook the product is still Facebook. The only name that changed was that of the company that owns Facebook, which makes sense as that holding company also runs other products like Instagram.

      Google made a similar move in 2015 when it created Alphabet to hold the non Google parts of Google.

      In both cases the renaming was on the coorporate side. They made no effort to loose the old trademark, and continue to operate under it today.

      The only high profile case that comes to mind that is simmilar to Twitter is when Comcast rebranded itself as Xfinity in 2010. In that case, it worked because: A) Comcasts reputation was way worse than Twitters and B) people don’t have that much of an option anyway. In the otherhand, the rebranding failed in the sense that everyone still knows them as Comcast.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          I think they DID buy xfinity, then used the name because they were done wiping their ass with “comcast”. I only say this because I distinctly remember having both xfinity and comcast showing up as internet options on some old house listings.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            xfinity wasn’t an acquisition, it was just comcast rebranding trying to separate itself from the stank of comcast. It did occur during a time of acquisitions of other cable networks, but that’s been true of comcast for 15ish years. both domains still work for customers.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              Ahhh, so it could’ve been a local acquisition changing their names on ads before Comcast finished the job, or maybe vice-versa somehow. Interesting.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 years ago

        Largely true but as a small aside, Google is still a company (within Alphabet). Alphabet is purely a corporate structure, and all branding still has Google on it. Whereas Facebook is now only a product, Meta is the company brand with its own logo and products named directly after it (like Meta Quest).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      372 years ago

      In defense of Zuckerberg – and there’s something I never thought I’d say – they changed the name of the company so that they could introduce new brands. They were not dumb enough to rebrand the successful products. It’s just now Facebook by Meta.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    982 years ago

    I’m so tired of these woke CEOs and their snowflake whining over misgendering their companies. There’s the name that a company is assigned at birth, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to change the way I’ve always called them (for my whole life and ALL of god-fearing Christian history) because some liberal snowflake CEO one-day wakes up and simply declares, “twitter is now X” ffs.

    The facts of the birth incorporation certificate, DON’T CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS little pissant mUsK… GET OVER IT!

    /s since satire is dead.

    • Queen HawlSera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Mr. Pibb, Dr. Robotnik, Sierra Mist, I’m not using your woke “Pibb Extra, Dr. Eggman, Starry” nonsense!

      • Nepenthe
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Oh, that’s what that was about? I honestly just assumed Starry was some crap knock-off that the restaurant just happened to have that day. Not really sure what the motive would be or why they’d expect the reaction to rebranding a nearly 20yr old product would be any other assumption. I’m going to disagree with them. They should be glad I’m not calling them Sprite.

        • Queen HawlSera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yeah… I thought the same, that it was some knock-off company’s bootleg Sprite, wasn’t a very good idea, especially since the product packaging looks like Sprite’s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -72 years ago

      “The Chaser” is a satire site. You’re getting really angry over something that never happened.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    942 years ago

    Image Transcription:

    X post by user The Chaser @chaser reading: ‘Stop calling it Twitter’ says guy who deadnames his own child. Underneath is a photo of Elon Musk’s face with a barely visible Tesla logo in the background and the link to the article at chaser.com.au

    [I am a human, if I’ve made a mistake please let me know. Please consider providing alt-text for ease of use. Thank you. 💜]

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    722 years ago

    Legend says if you say Twitter 13 times inside of a Tesla at 4:20am, Elon Musk will appear inside the car

    • MentalEdge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      602 years ago

      More likely that the autopilot kicks in, locks the doors, and drives into a lake.

      • Apathy Tree
        link
        fedilink
        English
        102 years ago

        That’s going to happen anyway when he enables The Code, he just has to wait for enough people to buy them to save the climate he’s actively helping destroy with rockets, then he gets all them tree hugger no good hippies in one go!

        /foil hat

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 years ago

      And if you say Twitter 69 times inside of a Tesla models S3XY at sharp 4:20am, Elon Musk will cum inside the car

  • ✖️ 🇨 ✖️ 🇨 🐝
    link
    fedilink
    592 years ago

    Sure Elon, I can provide this service to you for just $8/month. It’s great value honestly, I have expenses to continue to run my life and just $8 will happily contribute towards that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Double that and you can rest assured that the X I will pronounce will be verified to have come out of my own mouth. Not someone else’s, mine.

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      I’m bad at math, but Elon Musk is worth $229 billion dollars, which I think is enough to give every person on Earth $8 a month for a while.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    47
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    No. I’m exercising my Musk-given right of ultimate free speech and will continue calling it Twitter, just because I feel like it. Musk would be proud of me standing up against censorship. Oh wait…

  • Margot Robbie
    link
    fedilink
    462 years ago

    … And all of this could have been avoided if he just renamed it “Twitter by X”, so make Twitter part of the X super-app that he wanted to build.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    432 years ago

    I could call it that but then nobody would know what the fuck I’m talking about. Maybe at least pick a name that’s unique?

  • Flying SquidM
    link
    fedilink
    412 years ago

    Yep. One of many reasons I’m not catering to the whims of a billionaire and calling it what he wants it to be called. It’s going to continue to be Twitter as far as I’m concerned.