If you can, use Firefox.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    971 year ago

    Chrome got blacklisted by our IT dept because of this.

    “Ads are attack vectors.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      311 year ago

      And mine is making the switch from Firefox to Chrome next year. I’m so fucking mad about it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        301 year ago

        Ditto. The security department made the push because too many people were installing unapproved addons like ublock. They are mandating chrome, “for security”. LMAO

        The irony is that people are signing into chrome with personal gmail and leaking stuff.

        • mosiacmango
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You can lockdown user addons in both chrome and firefox via GPO. You can also auto install them with the same policies if you like. Both browsers have enterpise admx files available.

          Your security department sounds like they are bad at their jobs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            331 year ago

            Your security department sounds like they are bad at their jobs.

            First time in corporate?

            • mosiacmango
              link
              fedilink
              English
              15
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Nah. I work in the field.

              Im well aware of bad security teams. Looks like they got one.

          • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘
            link
            fedilink
            English
            141 year ago

            Came here to say the exact same thing. It really is amazing to me just how many IT professionals are bad at their jobs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              151 year ago

              Tech is a boogie man to many executypes. I’ve seen plenty of IT pros that were in over their head but smooth enough con men. If they keep coming up with things to throw money at/trim money out of convincingly they have long and successful careers.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                61 year ago

                When I lost my job over the summer I put my resume on dice and immediately had 3-4 guys with Indian accents calling me every day. I found a new job within a week. I still get emails and texts though, can’t put the genie back in the bottle

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          uBlock Origin is pretty much approved by Mozilla and ads are a big attack vector while Chrome is spyware.

          If they use Windows, you can use Firefox Portable of PortableApps.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Switch to Edge would make sense due to how well it integrates with things like your Entra ID account, choosing Chrome now is bizarre. We also had Chrome as primary browser for years, but now we are pushing Edge as primary browser. Firefox was and still is an option for us as well.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Not sure, it’s a big corpo so the decision is far from me. Probably bribes or a C level exec that likes Chrome on his home laptop.

    • Gormadt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      251 year ago

      Chrome hasn’t worked for months on our network due to this and was removed recently with the latest updates last week

    • FenrirIII
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      Waiting to hear if my company follows suit. Most of our internal tools are built with Chrome in mind, so it would be a big effort to standardize on something else.

      • RedFox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Chrome is pretty much the defacto standard for web. If it works with chrome, you’re probably safe.

    • JustARegularNerd
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Meanwhile my work mandates that we must use Edge. It’s fine from a usability perspective but I would much prefer my beloved Firefox at work, especially with the tab groups they have where you can have multiple different sessions

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I’ve been using Edge at work. I literally made the decision as “this is a Microsoft heavy shop, Microsoft is pushing Edge hard, and Bing is kinda good now, so let’s see how this goes” and I haven’t had a need to switch back.

        I use Edge’s different profiles for testing, work stuff and personal stuff to keep them nicely separated and prevent any from bleeding too hard into eachother

  • strawberry
    link
    fedilink
    451 year ago

    The Federated Learning of Cohorts and now the Topics API are part of a plan to pitch an “alternative” tracking platform, and Google argues that there has to be a tracking alternative—you can’t just not be spied on.

    lmao what the fuck kind of dystopia are we living in

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      It’d make the world a better place, but a big company would make slightly less money, therefore it’s unthinkable to even attempt it.

      See also: vehicle emissions standards

      • Poplar?
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        In the case of Google, the effect on advertising bringing in “slightly less money” is an understatement :)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      So this means that the internet could have always worked fine without invasive cookies and everything they told us about it being impossible was just a lie.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        181 year ago

        Cookies serve important purposes for doing things like keeping you signed in as you navigate through multiple pages on a site.

        The issue is that most parts of the internet were developed by people more interested in all the cool stuff you could do with it, and not at all concerned about the potential misuse by large multi billion dollar corporations.

        • Poplar?
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          You defend cookies in general. But the person youre replying to might have meant third-party cookies by “invasive cookies” ?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            Cookies are a part of the http protocol and the server side design of the websites themselves. You can’t just replace them with a password manager on your individual client.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -12
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              no a password manager can’t replace cookies, Like a JPEG can’t replace a 2 hour long film.

              I have however forgone cookies for the most part. Great for privacy.

              I’d recommend keepassxc, bookmarking and some addons like ublock, no script, libredirect. Most sites still work and the few that don’t aren’t worth my time

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Cookies are literally how a website keeps track of you having logged with a username and password into that site on your browser, for all other pages after you leave the log-in page.

                The reason for this is because the Web protocols were designed for the web server to get a request from a browser, send the page to the browser and after that close the connection (though since HTTP version 1.1 connections might stay up for things like sending the pictures linked to a page, a mechanism known as Keep-Alive).

                For performance by default the web server doesn’t really care which browser has asked it for a given page or what it has asked for before unless some kind of tracking is added to the pages your receive so that in subsequent requests you’re identified.

                So the only way for a website to keep track of a specific browser so that it can do different things for that browser (i.e. know a user has logged-in via that browser so send to that browser pages that user has access to rather than sending “You are not logged-in” errors) is by sending some kind of token to the browser which the browser will then present along with each subesequent request to that site.

                Cookies are by far the easiest way to do this.

                The problem with cookies is that their ability to track a browser has be abused for things far beyond their original purpose (mainly things like track the browser were a user logged-in, to know to which browsers it can send certain protected pages and information).

                There are some sites that can track a user in that site after log-in with a different method (basically all the links you get in pages on that website have a tiny bit of extra information that identifies each request as coming from a specific browser, but for example if you come into the website again from a bookmark all that is lost), but those are pretty rare nowadays because it can be quite complex to get it work whilst cookies are pretty straightforward to get to work reliably.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 year ago

    Switching away from Chrome is something that is always worth repeating, but just FYI this happened last September and isn’t “new”. If you’re on Chrome and are only just now realizing this, it’s been your reality for the last 5 months.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 year ago

        Yeah Google has cleverly re-defined privacy as “give all your data to us and we will protect it from prying eyes”.

        People love it though. So private and easy and awesome for scrolling.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      I used to use the good browser. But then they changed what the good browser was. Now what I’m with isn’t it, and what’s it seems weird and scary to me.

      ITLL HAPPEN TO YOU

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      Mozilla Phoenix user here. Good old times. Then Firebird came along. Then Firefox… What an odd name change that was, IMO. Firefox. Huh.

      Then Chrome came and I jumped on that ship for years until the new revamped Firefox came in 2018, and as it looks nowadays, I won’t ever leave Firefox until it dies of death.

      Chrome has a pretty sleek design these days, but my conscience tells me I can’t use it.

      I use Chromium for web development (testing purposes only), but I’m not sure if Chromium is any better. At least I’m not signed in to it.

      • Twitches
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They ditched Phoenix because the bios manufacturer had that copy right. There’s a whole story behind it.

        Firefox in China is also known as a red panda

        • Victor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          Ah, so that’s the reason. I never bothered to find out. Thanks! Only 20 years later or so 😅

          • Twitches
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Lol I only found out about a month ago. So I’m in the same boat.

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    It’s also already built into Google Play Services. Remember this when they claim a monopoly is good for “security” reasons.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      Amazing how Google and Apple differ on so much, but in this respect they are in total agreement…

      • cum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        Security is a good cop out to justify a lot of bullshit

        • Draconic NEO
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Indeed it is. Unfortunately though it’s also important enough that it means people will go along with fascist stuff if the “security” excuse is used, and people who stand up to it will be mocked and ridiculed at best, or be accused of being cyber attackers at worst.

  • Rufus Q. Bodine III
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 year ago

    “Did any user in the world want a user-tracking and ad platform baked directly into their browser? Probably not, but this is Google, and they control Chrome, and this probably still won’t make people switch to Firefox.”

    • RedFox
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Their idea is that is hides all the user info from advertising companies. Downside is your browser is an ad slot machine.

      Which is best?

      Tracked or ad machine?

      I’m more surprised people aren’t talking about the fact that since it’s running on the client side, someone would just figure out a way to hack and block all the ads even easier.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        This also further consolidates Google’s advertising power. Block all their competitors from gathering the information and give them a neutered “topics list”. Google still maintains every ability to allow their own products and ad platform to bypass and use the full information.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        It hides user information from companies which aren’t Google. The best is not using anything Chromium based.

        Extensions require APIs from the browser to work, and Google is going to nerf the APIs which allow for ad blocking. Extensions don’t have unfettered access to the DOM. FF used to be like that, but Chrome never allowed that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 year ago

        Because the entire design of it is to mathematically prevent you from having the option to hack or block the ads. THe way to get around it is to… not use chrome.

    • Neato
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      You’re thinking about it the wrong way. How does this directly and noticably harm the user experience of the average user of chrome? If it doesn’t then there’s no incentive for them to switch.

      Not everyone knows about this kind of thing or cares. Firefox has to be significantly better in obvious ways and market that to grow their market share.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      I wish I could stick to Firefox but I’ve been having trouble with looping captchas on there. 90% of the time Firefox works fine but there’s still a handful of websites that just refuse to work unless I’m using chrome.

      • finalarbiter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Some websites intentionally change behavior based on your user agent. There are plenty of extensions for Firefox that let you change it so sites think you’re using chrome instead. It’s wild to me that’s even a thing, but ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      401 year ago

      Are you serious? You can’t be compassionate toward people who use a certain browser? It’s probably because they don’t understand/know/care. 🤷‍♂️ Educate them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      People who care make the switch so not sure what there is to feel compassionate about.

      Its kinda nice they slowed YouTube down first, that got at least 3 people i know into using firefox, though if i still want to annoy them i could tell them to run a invidius docker instead.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      In some ways, it is unavoidable, because chrome is also embedded in Windows, and the electron framework. You can’t blame someone for using it that way.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    next up: every page requires shitty chrome or login with google.

    then the big shrug and all continue using chrome, iphone, amazon and the other evils.

    if you are using any of the above YOU are the problem.

    thoughts and prayers. wasch mich, aber mach mich nicht nass.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        For sure. I more mean it happens a lot, so probably that’s the kind of crowd that is/was attracted here? Or we have a lot of bots.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -121 year ago

      I would ask “Whats with Lemmy and telling people what software to use?”. I am all in favour of being aware of the pros and cons but let people decide for themselves once they are aware.

  • LinusWorks4Mo
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    I’m totally unable to switch from chrome, the chrome icon is really the only one that works, all others are just too hard to see

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      eww icky also this article is old

      by Ron Amadeo - Sep 7, 2023 2:35pm PST