• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      30
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Why not? Isn’t most of the radiation coming from the rod itself? I’d expect a vertical, high-intensity cloud over the rod, which gets less intense the further it goes to the left and to the right of it.

      • Natanael
        link
        fedilink
        74
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The high frequency of the gamma radiation mostly ignores the relatively thin lens material, you have to be very very close for the geometry of the sensor and source and their alignment to significantly impact the noise in the image

      • ferret
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        Because the radiation isn’t significantly affected by the camera optics

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1028 months ago

    The Cobalt-60 in that cinnamon stick has a half-life of about 5 years. It says it was made in 1963 so with the drop in radioactivity you’ve probably got a few months left to live!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    408 months ago

    When doing my NIH traineeship, in the new lab, it came to be my turn to do the monthly radiation inventory. When going down the list, while checking the radio labeled nucleotides and labeled reagents in the freezer etc, I came across an entry for 600 Curies of Co 60! Freaking out I immediately went to the PI and told him about this. He laughed and said someone had to be responsible for the campus radiation source and since our lab used it a lot to make feeder cells, we were the lucky custodians of said source. I did get quite the fright though!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    248 months ago

    I thought that said “drop and rub” like “you’re probably gonna die the horrific death of radiation poisoning you should just expedite it”