• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    22 years ago

    Decisions like this just prove how massive the market for a self-hostable alternative is. They’re not banning it because it’s a bad tool, they’re banning it because they’re concerned about what happens to the source code their engineers paste into it.

    There are already a bunch of OSS attempts, and it likely won’t take long until we have something of comparable quality to ChatGPT is available for companies to host on their own hardware.

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    How to neuter your own ability to compete: ban your workers from using the latest tool for boosting employee performance.

      • animist
        link
        fedilink
        02 years ago

        Better stop using xerox machines to make copies and write everything out by hand

    • Ulu-Mulu-no-die
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Leaking industry secrets is a much bigger concern that boosting productivity a little bit.

      We’re talking about very specialized engineering work, it’s not something you can totally rely on a bot to do, though it might help sometimes, it’s fully understandable for specialized companies to want to ban GPT internally, until there’s a way for them to host a totally internal one.

    • RupeThereItIs
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      It’s a MASSIVE security risk. What you tell ChatGPT is not private, if you knowingly or unknowingly tell ChatGPT secret information you have no control over where that information may go. Especially for a company for Apple that lives & breaths on surprise product releases.