• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Yeah, took me a couple tries. I thought mods were stopping “fuel extremism,” so like maybe people were talking about intentionally wasting gas or something, and mods were telling users to cut it out.

      I got there, but it was a bit of word-salad at first.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      63 months ago

      Most of those moderation just step in the moment the lie enters the chat.

      And no, you freedom of speech does not allow you to lie without facing the consecuences

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      03 months ago

      Both sides, because both have extremist ideologies.

      Freedom of speech is a government thing, this article is about organisations. It doesn’t apply.

    • Allah
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -263 months ago

      wow downvoted for asking question so much for tolerant left

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        Nah, downvoted because it doesn’t spark healthy discussion.

        “What about freedom of speech?” isn’t a valid question because the article is about social media, not a government. There are no freedom of speech rights on social media platforms.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 months ago

          You expect Americans to actually understand anything about their own bill of rights? Seems unreasonable given how uneducated they are