• dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    fedilink
    English
    852 months ago

    Boy howdy, I sure can’t wait for 99.9% of all manufacturers on Earth to completely ignore this as well, and keep selling devices and cables that are completely unlabeled.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        But they’ll still sell you a $180 USB C cable that’s no different than one you can get for $75 and has all of it’s labels.

      • ddh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -22 months ago

        Pick a different scapegoat; Apple’s one of the better ones in this area

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Name one Apple cable that has any type of text on it. Or computer for that matter. They do simple. It’s not in their design.

    • The_Decryptor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Stuff that’s spec compliant has to follow the rules, non-spec compliant stuff can obviously do whatever, so yeah the cheap cables off ebay or amazon won’t use the right logos.

  • Aatube
    link
    fedilink
    402 months ago

    But what about my shiny Certified USB 3.2 Gen1x2 Legendary SS+?

      • Aatube
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        (“legendary” and “shiny” aren’t actually part of the name but SS+ is and it stands for SuperSpeed+. which is super-a-gacha pull

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          I’m using a printer cable from 2006 to send audio out to my DAC. Sounds pretty fucking good.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            I have connected my printer with a 120€ audiophile cable, and I tell you the prints are just a lot sharper. It gives the text a lot more air , especially around the serifs. Times New Roman looks especiallygood with it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 months ago

              But does it feel warm? Can you see the texture of those patrices pounding the paper? The natural feeling of primal typographic power, transferred unbiased by our golden cable?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 months ago

    Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand! I assume displayport compatible ports will still have that symbol, which is fine. Soon I’ll be and to price out laptops that will work with a docking station without needing to read the damn manuals!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Thank fuck, a simple and clear marking that an average user can understand!

      Next thing you know - all the hardware producers just start using some new standard they’ve collectively conceived. Because “simple and clear” is bad for their business.

    • recursive_recursion they/them
      link
      fedilink
      English
      73
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s actually different and better as the previous naming scheme was actually horrendous (trying to explain it to customers was a nightmare).

      Cause previously if you wanted to figure out what speed of USB port you were getting you’d have to look up the table because me telling you that a port was USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 doesn’t tell you jack shit.

      Can you see how cursed this is for non-tech savvy people? Absolutely terrible.

      Thankfully now the new naming scheme will be:
      USB +

      • 5 Gbps
      • 10 Gbps
      • 20 Gbps
      • 40 Gbps

      So the xkcd meme actually isn’t relevant here.

      Edit:
      Revised grammar in the first sentence

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Techies have a hard time understanding that just because you can look up some speeds easily doesn’t mean jack shit for regular joe trying to buy an usb-c cable.

        Having data speed and wattage indicated on the cable is important, but for most people simply the data speed is enough.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          I can’t remember the last time I cared about data speed for a USB cable, but charging speed is useful when I’m charging my phone before leaving the house.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -32 months ago

            Once again, you are probably at least somewhat technical and understand wattage, do you think joe schmoe does? Or do they just charge their phone more often?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Even non-technical people know 80W is more than 10W. They know that Watts usually refers to electrical power.

              People have been buying lightbulbs of varying wattages, and understanding it just fine, for many decades now. Even my grandma who can barely operate anything more complex than a kettle has a good grasp of it.

              I think you have it the opposite way around. The average person has a much better grasp of Watts than they do of data speeds in Gigabits per second.

    • Beacon
      link
      fedilink
      282 months ago

      The only thing changing here is the way cables are going to be labeled, the tech itself is staying exactly the same.

      And on top of that, the author was generally correct for most situations, but usb (and especially usb c) truly has replaced a ton of separate connectors with a single standard. And it’s very likely to continue to replace even more as time goes on

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      Huh? That’s not at all how it would be in this instance. They’re updating branding guidelines within an existing standard, not creating a new standard.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 months ago

    General rule:

    The longer the product’s name, the more bullshit you get.

    USB 3.2 Gen 2x2

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    We’re adding new, different symbols to the confusing mess of old symbols and keeping both? Neat!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      And whatever you buy is just going to be labeled as the fastest even if it doesn’t actually meet the standard.

        • Rhaedas
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          “Up to” is fine for this, as it’s a measure of capacity. It’s when it’s used as an expected norm like the ISPs do that it becomes more marketing than a rating. The requirement ought to be a known average of realistic usage and not a top end number.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 months ago

    I’m still trying to find a good beard trimmer and electric toothbrush that charge with USB-C.

    These are the only gadgets i have left that aren’t charged with USB-C.

    • The_Decryptor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      7
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s USB2, so either for charging or simpler devices that don’t need USB3 (Like keyboards).

      Edit: Federation issue? I swear there wasn’t an existing reply when I responded.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      That would be USB 2.0 and is pretty safe to assume that all USB ports and cables support this (If you can find a USB 1.0 or 1.1 port I’ll be impressed). Why bother with a 480Mbps logo if it’s the default minimum?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Isn’t that naming like a few years old? I already have a cable with 40 gbps 240 W on it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes. They broke the news on this branding guidelines change in 2022.

      It’s unclear why it’s making the headlines again now - perhaps they started enforcing it somehow (although I’m unsure how that would even work) at the beginning of the year?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    Usually what’s called simpler as opposed to techy ways makes things, in fact, loads of crap more complex.