Google recently open sourced Pebble and today, Repebble has put some of the watches up for preorder.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 days ago

      I understand that the watch operating system is open source. However, it seems that the watch will connect to a companion smartphone app. Do you know if the app is a requirement and/or if the app will be open source?

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -114 days ago

      IIRC, it has a reflective LCD, not epaper display.

      • Wise
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        Core 2 Duo

        • 1.2" black/white e-paper screen

        Core Time 2

        • 1.5" 64 color e-paper screen

        Am I missing something?

        • Farid
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          The watch featured a 32-millimetre (1.26 in) 144 × 168 pixel black and white memory LCD using an ultra low-power “transflective LCD

          The problem is that e-paper is a category of displays, and some companies label reflective LCDs as “e-paper”. Which is subjective (and I personally heavily disagree with that categorization, cause then LCD clocks and Gameboys have “e-paper” displays, too).

          But in the comment I responded to it was said Pebble has “eink” display, which is categorically wrong, as that is a very specific proprietary technology, which is e-paper in traditional sense, like the ones in Kindles.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 days ago

            Your response says, “not epaper” which is categorically wrong. I assume you meant to say “eink”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 days ago

    Of all possible names, they’re really using “Core 2 Duo”? I feel like anyone who has been following tech long enough would immediately think of the Intel processor when hearing that name.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 days ago

    I still have my circa-2016 email confirming my pledge for the Time 2 Silver, which ultimately got cancelled just before the fulfillment date due to Pebble selling out to Fitbit.

    While I loved my original Pebble back then, I would really want something similar to look and function of the T2S so will watch this project in hopes it too is resurrected

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      due to Pebble selling out to Fitbit.

      Due to Pebble going bankrupt, and managing to sell its software assets to Fitbit to gain just enough money to refund the kickstarter pledges and pay off it’s biggest debts.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I’ve pre-ordered the Core Time 2.

    Pre-orders are something I never usually do, but given this is essentially just an improved version of an existing product, as opposed to a Kickstarter, I feel more confident. And I can cancel the preorder at any time (plus I’ll see reviews of the cheaper model before the Core Time 2 ships).

    The price made me wince, though. It’s very expensive for the functionality. Technically cheaper than the original watches adjusted for inflation, but that ignores the current-day smartwatch market. Still, I loved the Pebble, so I think it’s worth it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      I pre ordered, and I’m usually annoyingly loud about not pre-ordering. That being said, i love my pebble time. I Kickstarted it back in the day, and it still works but the battery is weak. I could replace the battery, but i want more devices like this, so I’ll put some money in and eat Ramen for a few weeks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 days ago

        Preordered here too, for all the same reasons. I went for the Time2, even though it’s not due to ship until later. I’ve waited nearly ten years, I can wait another six months…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 days ago

    I still can’t believe that no one else has made a smart watch with physical buttons and low energy use that has surpassed the pebble after all this time. I’m still cautious that this venture will pan out, but honestly there really hasn’t been a smart watch released that matches my use case. Sleep tracking makes no sense if I have to charge the watch daily, as I’d probably charge it over night. Media control with screen buttons is awful. Fossil came close with their hybrid smart watch, but the layout of the media controls made no sense and couldn’t easily be used without looking at the watch. Just let me check my calendar and texts and skip through ads in podcasts, and last over a week of battery and you will have my money.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 days ago

    Is there any company that let’s you export your health tracking data in a non proprietary format and doesn’t charge you a monthly subscription to use your smartwatch’s health tracking features?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 days ago

      Garmin allows you to export data to a csv file. I’m not sure if it’s all data because I haven’t used it, but I know it’s simple.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 days ago

        That’s good to know, I liked the MIP display watches I saw from Garmin, but the only model with that display seems to be their most expensive watch

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 days ago

          I think the forerunner 55 is MIP. It’s not a smart watch and it’s their base level running watch. I had one before I upgraded to the 265 and I loved it. Off the top of my head, I know it gives you sleep data, heart rate, data, stress level data, a HRV, VO2 max. Max. Maybe some other things. Along with the standard steps and Miles moved or kilometers moved.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            111 days ago

            Seems like it can be connected to your phone to see notifications and control music using the Garmin app, do I guess it’s smart enough for me, that plus health monitoring and long battery life are all I need, and it’s more affordable than other smartwatch’s as well. Does Garmin charge a monthly subscription to use the health monitoring? And does it allow you to export the health data?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 days ago

              The 255 is also MIP and is basically the same as the one I have (265). The 265 swapped out the display for an amoled display.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              211 days ago

              No their app is free. You can access via your phone and on the web. Fyi music control on the Garmin is a bit clunky, but it works.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        212 days ago

        One pro of Withings is that they’re French, so their policies on data in general are pretty great.

        One con of Withings is that they’re French, so it’s not actually pronounced how you think.

  • AItoothbrush
    link
    fedilink
    English
    013 days ago

    Pebble sounds cool but i really dont like square watches(except the retro casios and gshocks) and now its owned by google so thats shit as well.

    • Synestine
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 days ago

      Google dumped the Pebble OS code on GitHub when this whole “rePebble” thing (not Rebble) started. Now there’s a new phone app coming out soon (or out now, depending on your platform and abilities) that handles old and new Pebbles and modern phone platforms.

      None of this is from Google.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    I backed the original pebble on kickstarter and it’s what got me into smart watches. Happy they’re coming back and that they’re open source.

    Edit: if I’m remembering correctly wasn’t there some server that the original pebble used that shut done that ended up knee-capping it? Wonder if there’s anything server-side being used here that could do the same.

    • JohnEdwa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Pebble still works thanks to the Rebble project. Everything else is free, but the dictation and weather services require a monthly $3 subscription to use as those are the parts that have rather hefty API call costs.

      Though the experience is miserable on iOS. That’s entirely all thanks to Apple.

        • JohnEdwa
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          The Pebble app was removed from the App store, so you have to manually sideload it every 7 days.

          And:

          Here are the things that are harder or impossible for 3rd party smartwatches (ie non Apple Watches) to do on iPhone:

          • There’s no way for a smartwatch to send text messages or iMessages.
          • You can’t reply to notifications or take ‘actions’ like marking something as done.
          • It’s very difficult to enable other iOS apps to work with Pebble. Basically iOS does not have the concept of ‘interprocess communication’(IPC) like on Android. What we did before was publish an SDK that other apps (like Strava) could integrate to make their own BLE connection to Pebble. It was a clunky quasi-solution that other apps didn’t like, because it was hard to test (among other things)
          • If you (accidentally) close our iOS app, then your watch can’t talk to app or internet
          • Impossible for watch to detect if you are using your phone, so your watch will buzz and display a notification even if you are staring at your iPhone
          • You can’t easily side load apps onto an iPhone. That means we have to publish the app on the iPhone appstore. This is a gigantic pain because Apple. Every update comes with the risk that a random app reviewer could make up some BS excuse and block the update.
          • Because of iOS Appstore rules, it would be hard for us to enable 3rd party watchface/app developers to charge for their work (ie we can’t easily make an appstore within our app)
          • Getting a Javascript engine to run in PebbleOS forced us to go through many hoops due to iOS — creating a compiler inside the Pebble iPhone app that in itself needed to be written in (cross-compiled to) JS to work with Apple’s restriction on downloadable code can only be JS
          • As a Pebble watch/app developer, using the iOS app as relay to the watch sucks since the “developer mode” terminates every few minutes
            https://ericmigi.com/blog/apple-restricts-pebble-from-being-awesome-with-iphones