• @magnusrufus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Are you trying to say that American exceptionalism wasn’t a big thing for decades? Cause that’s not true. Are you trying to say that not every American engaged in it? Cause that’s not a useful point.

      • I’m trying to say that prejudice based on stereotypes is still prejudice, and I believe that is a useful point.

        In fact, that is the entire point. Individuals deserve to be judged on their own character and not on a caricature presented by others.

        I dunno, seems reasonable to me. Be well.

        • @magnusrufus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          As a general rule sure but in the sense of taking a braggart down a peg, like with the resentment towards american exceptionalism, trying to raise that to the level of prejudice is too much. It could even be seen as cheapening actual issues of prejudice.

          • What cheapens the issues of prejudice is actively participating in it, thus normalizing it.

            Justifying the resentment of an entire group based on the actions of some isn’t bringing them down a peg. It’s just just perpetuating negatively, at best.

            • @magnusrufus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Nah, knockin us for going on about “Murica #1” isn’t on the same level as the actual prejudice against the Roma for example.

                  • No, I said supporting prejudicial views normalizes it and thus exacerbates it. I didn’t say all prejudices were equal. But, continue to support it if you want. Maybe I will too, seems healthy.