• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    You made that point as if it were relevant or necessary. It’s insulting and simple-minded to believe that speaking out against prejudice is necessarily equivocation. And it’s frankly weird to support being prejudiced at all. And the lengths to which you fight for that view is gross, and you’re in bad company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Ok so it’s not that you don’t think there is a difference you just think that difference is irrelevant and that acknowledging that difference is supporting prejudice?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I think you support being prejudiced as an acceptable moral premise, and you bring up equivocation in a weak attempt to justify it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Ok because before you were not being serious and it’s a pretty fine line between what you say when you are just fucking around and what you say when you are being serious.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 years ago

                  And the support of bigotry thing is still you being sincere? Cause that’s in direct opposition to everything I’ve said so far.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 years ago

                    Naw, I was like, “boo bigotry,” and you were like, “Yeah, but it’s understandable in this case, and also, it’s worse for the Roma so I can’t believe you think they’re the same 🤓.”