• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    152 years ago

    Live in a not so small town in Germany. I haven’t had the need to have a car after I have been living for 9 years.

    I commute with bike to work, take public transport when it’s a farther journey.

    Until I have a daughter a couple of months ago. I realize that I really need a car. :(

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      It’s hard to have a baby without a car. It’s for sleep, for nappy changing, your closet and your pantry. Those first few years especially. If you need one even for a few years it’s totally understandable.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Even in America, I have seen a fair few parents carrying their kids around by bike. It seems it’s not totally impossible, though you may need to put your bike through some upgrades.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        It’s possible, but it’s really obnoxious and shitty. Especially if the weather is too cold for a new born to be outside.

        New born parents is one of the few true excuses to use a car over a bike, imo.

        But that’s okay, we’ll still need roads for emergency services anyway so it’s okay if some people use them.

      • pewter
        link
        fedilink
        -62 years ago

        I bet those people are doing it for economic reasons, not environmental ones. A bicycle is probably the most dangerous form of transportation for you to have your kid on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          142 years ago

          How us bicycle more dangerous than cars?

          Sure cars have all the safety features for people on the inside, but on a bike you’re exposed to much slower speeds and better field of view. Bike accidents have much smaller fatality rate than car accidents.

          Unless of course you mean cycling among cars is less safe, but that argument just confirms that cars are unsafe, not bikes. Bikes are not dangerous. Cars are.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          9
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It wouldn’t be any dangerous if car and bike infrastructure was structurally separated (and if there were far fewer cars).

              • pewter
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                Of course, but if my vehicle was the only vehicle in the world, I’d still feel like a 2 year old kid on the back of my bike going 7 miles is more dangerous than on a bus, train, or even a car over the same distance.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  42 years ago

                  Fair enough, a seat on the back is the least safe option to transport kids.

                  There are options like this though. Seatbelts, low position, side walls.

                  • pewter
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 years ago

                    I don’t mind this too much, but I’d want more padding for the kid and an extra wheel in the back for stability.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 years ago

      I have two kids and use a bike (for ecological reasons). I realize I’m incredibly lucky my area has very good and safe biking infrastructure. Had to upgrade to a electric cargo bike when the second one came about, but I don’t regret at all, it’s more’confortable and safer for the kids. I do own an old ICE car, which I considered replacing with a new EV, but since I drive maybe a few hundreds of kilometers per year, I figured it’d make more sense to keep the old diesel than to replace it.