You joke but why don’t we apply that human rights knowledge and integrate billionaires into society? Of course there are huge power issues. Why does this make dehumanization suddenly acceptable?
Instead of letting Forbes compile a list, what could be a good start for interactions?
Using the B word is class reductionist. Please say “Person of Means” /s
Are they truly persons of means if they don’t use said means to enact change in the world?
Oh they’ll enact change, alright. Just not the kind you’d like.
That’s because they’re evil.
That’s why they could become rich in the first place
There’s no such thing as a billionaire without blood on their hands.
That’s what the M in billionaire stands for
err, try that again maybe?
In that case, they’re persons of ends, and their end is to justify their means
First in line when the revolution comes.
Person of beans
Largely because their wealth is speculative and they require those ads to keep the charade running.
Some of them oscillate between billionaire and millionaire, so just call them person of means or “leech”
You joke but why don’t we apply that human rights knowledge and integrate billionaires into society? Of course there are huge power issues. Why does this make dehumanization suddenly acceptable?
Instead of letting Forbes compile a list, what could be a good start for interactions?
Blots and blood eagles.
And for the more squeamish Car bombs private jet edition.