• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -51 year ago

    It sucks, sure. But it’s been free for a really long time, and it costs money to run a service.

    You can’t really expect that a service will serve an increasing amount of people free stuff forever.

    At least making people visit the site will encourage them to upload and help keep the service up.

    Btw, it’s not expensive and if you think it is. Just use some other service.

    • Metal Zealot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      151 year ago

      THEN ASK PEOPLE TO DONATE, how tone-deaf can you be about your own community?? What the fuck do they think Wikipedia is doing?
      I’ve found pirates & FOSS enthusiasts are FAR more likely to donate into something they use regularly and appreciate, this is a blatant slap in the face to those people.

    • Metal Zealot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This unfortunately helps sets a precedent for what the internet is going to look like in the future. Even the most basic things will be behind a paywall.
      You cant even read a fucking news article from New York Times, who made 173.91 million dollars last year

        • Kuori [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          nothing should ever be better than it was in the past. everything should continue to suck forever.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          True, but just look at how much better it has gotten in the last couple decades. Putting the news behind the paywall runs the risk of ending the battle for impressions and might force nuance into well researched stories.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -31 year ago

            How much money do you think they would have made if they gave away all their content for free.

            News is pretty expensive.

            • Metal Zealot
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              You mean the world renowned, universally known news agency in America owned by billionaires?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                I am not familiar with who owns who in the USA. I do know that news wouldn’t get made if no one wanted to pay for it.

    • kbal
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      But it’s been free for a really long time

      Of course it has. You need to offer the world a useful service for some length of time before you have dominated the market to such an extent that you can cut the quality and jack up the prices without there being any meaningful competition to worry about.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -21 year ago

        You talk like they are owned by some huge corporation and this was their plan from the beginning.

        • kbal
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          So who exactly does own OpenSubtitles Group Limited, and what are their motivations? If you’re claiming to know, I assume you must be some kind of insider? Because they don’t seem to be all that open about it. Otherwise we can only judge by their actions.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            I don’t know who they are but it’s quite evident that they at least we’re a very small group in the beginning.

            I also haven’t seen any evidence that there is an evil corpo controlling them or something.

            Occam’s razor