@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agoIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1198arrow-down138
arrow-up1160arrow-down1external-linkIs it time for 6G already? Traffic analysis says yepwww.theregister.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish34•edit-22 years agoWhy don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
minus-squareMeeechlinkfedilinkEnglish9•2 years agoIf they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoI mean, you might have a point there. If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine. But… But… Seven ate nine. You ate eight! Seven nine! Waaaahhh!
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoNah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
minus-squareParanomalylinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoThey’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.
Why don’t we just skip 6G and just go straight to 7G
If they’re going to skip anything, it’s going to be 8… Because 7, 8, 9!
I mean, you might have a point there.
If seven ate nine, but you skip eight, it’s all OK! Seven nine.
But… But… Seven ate nine.
You ate eight!
Seven nine!
Waaaahhh!
Nah dude… That’s why they skipped 9 because 7 ate it. 9 was never a viable option
They’ll skip 9 as that seems to be Kryptonite to tech. Both Microsoft and Apple decided to skip straight from 8 to 10 with Windows and iPhone respectively.