@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-21 year agoFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.devimagemessage-square141fedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.37Karrow-down1imageFitbit Clock Faceprogramming.dev@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected] • edit-21 year agomessage-square141fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•1 year agohonestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•1 year agoit’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink7•1 year agoIt’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoTrue but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.
honestly just depends on what kind of watchface you want, square is cheaper and in some ways more convenient so if you don’t want an analog clockface there’s no reason to bother
it’s ugly and sticks out too much when it’s square. round is classy
It’s a chunk of plastic on your wrist. It’s always going to be a bit tacky.
True but it can also look sleek/modern, or at least rectangular can imo.