• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      No, that would harm whoever was in possession of the room at the time (owner or guest).

      This would be more akin to sneaking into a movie theatre to stand in the back and watch.

      But that would still be theft of service.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        I mean, if we extend this logic though, stealing a license is still harmful to the person who possesses the copyright. Breaking into a hotel room deprives the current possessor the exclusive right to possess the room; stealing a piece of software deprives the copyright holder the exclusive right to control their copyrighted work.

        Like, I’m not even anti-piracy for the most part. I just think the comparison in the OP is bad and doesn’t make a lot of sense.

        Someone else in this thread said it best – “just enjoy ya loot.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Breaking into a hotel room deprives the current possessor the exclusive right to possess the room; stealing a piece of software deprives the copyright holder the exclusive right to control their copyrighted work.

          I think the source of disagreement here is that you have a natural right to land use, but a purely legal right to exclusively control copies of your work.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Wouldn’t it be more like having one person seed the room and letting all the leechers stay in the room free of charge