• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 years ago

    There’s a difference between “I have a cottage that I visit 2 times a year” and “I live in the middle of nowhere and can’t possibly survive without a car!!” that a disproportionate number of people claim.

    Over 80% of Canadians live in urban areas, yet much more than 20% seem to think they live in such a rural environment that lowering car usage is impossible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      And then it depends on the context of the conversation. There are countless threads of naiive people arguing that we can get rid of all cars, and when they do, people bring up the edge cases.

      Going to a cottage once a year still requires a car.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          132 years ago

          In fact, if you only truly need a car a handful of times per year, it’s vastly cheaper and less hassle to just rent it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            72 years ago

            Precisely. And if someone can’t be convinced not to spend thousands of their own money on a transportation method in order to cover less than 1% of their trips, I don’t think they can be convinced at all.

      • @[email protected]M
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        There are countless threads of naiive people arguing that we can get rid of all cars,

        Okay, if you’re going to keep arguing that, it’s time for you to fucking cite some.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            English
            92 years ago

            Citing something means “post a hyperlink to the specific comment you think is an example,” not “vaguely send people off on a wild goose chase.”