• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Heavy day at work?

    What’s the weather like in Moscow?

    You know what also would have saved lives, and reduced tensions?

    Not going to war in the first place, the fact is that Putte was the one to attack and start this whole shitshow means that Russia is in the wrong, not Ukraine.

    • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      301 year ago

      What’s the weather like in Moscow?

      every time i see this i instinctively think its a bit. Surely there are not human beings this fucking deluded.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -11 year ago

        I am sorry to have to tell you this, but history doesn’t have a starting date as a concept.

        The maidan protests were hugely important and is not just fake propaganda.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        No? That is exactly why I didn’t enter a date in my post…

        Putte did attack Crimea in 2014, that is what I consider the start of the current conflict.

        • anaesidemus [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          151 year ago

          Putte? Is this some language thing or an infantile baby name a la Putler?

          The roots of the conflict lie in the illegal dissolution of the Soviet Union

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            Putte is a Swedish name that is commonly used to talk down to a person, calling them small, it is similar to Putin, and I like insulting dickheads with imperial dreams.

            As for the “illegal” dissolution of the Soviet Union, that is a different discussion and happened 22 years before the invasion of Crimea, and can’t be used as an excuse for the invasion in any rational argument based in reality.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -61 year ago

            The remnants of your alcohol diluted brains lie in the Soviet Union. The dissolution of USSR was not illegal, the formation of it was.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I should have probably said Soviet empire or whatever. Obviously I meant the aggressive expansion and funsie deals with nazies so they both get to commit their own little genocides

                • SSJ2Marx [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  231 year ago

                  The Red Army stopped the Holocaust and saved the world from fascism while the western powers were playing with their dicks in Africa. They only invaded France after it became clear that Soviet victory was inevitable in order to prevent Western Europe from being liberated from capitalism.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -51 year ago

                    Just because soviets did 1 right thing after nazis stabbed them in the back, doesn’t make them the good guys. Somehow you forgot to mention that soviet rapearmy also illegally occupied all the territory they passed on the way to Berlin

        • Flyberius [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          If Japan, South Korea or whoever suddenly had a Chinese backed coup and took control of US naval bases in their country, what do you think the US response would be?

          Because that’s exactly what happened in Ukraine. US backed coup, Russia moves in to Crimea to secure it’s black sea naval base.

          Is this the first time you are hearing this?

          Here’s another what if. What if Scotland voted for independence from the UK and became socialist or whatever. Do you think England wouldn’t seize is nuclear submarine bases north of Glasgow?

          How fucking baby brained are you?

        • CarbonScored [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          You mean the conflict that literally started with the people of Donetsk and Luhansk taking up arms against a government that was explicitly shutting down their language and implementing outright oppressive laws against their ethnicities?

    • Flyberius [comrade/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I mean, the US was stirring up shit on their doorstep for nearly a decade, backing a coup and then dangling NATO membership over the noses of the new puppet government. What did they expect to happen (p.s. they knew exactly what would happen, the US wanted a war)?

      And I mean, if the US can start wars half way across the world to protect its borders and interests I don’t think they can be too surprised if another power does the same thing in their own front yard.

      Regardless, I find the NATO malding utterly delicious. US about to lose yet another war.

      • jackmarxist [any]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        Favourite thing about this is that he literally admitted like 30 years ago that expanding NATO will provoke a reaction from Russia eventually and was against it before he got the MIC bribes. If they were so keen on expanding NATO then they should’ve let Russia into it when Yeltsin was in power and they could’ve had the entirety of eastern Europe in their fold but they just couldn’t resist punishing the Russian people for trusting the west in the 80s.

        • wildncrazyguy
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          You are attempting to rewrite history. Russia was in a downward spiral. As a whole it had yet to show that it could be a full ally to the West. Moreover, it is extremely rare in history for ideologically divergent cultures to become allies within the short term (exceptions such as Japan and USA, UK and USA, UK and France come to mind). It takes time (and usually generations removed) for such things to occur.

          Now, it appears the West’s hesitation at the time to accept Russia into NATO was prescient. Yes, maybe things could have been different if Russia had been accepted, but the risk that the alliance would have been shattered due to Russia’s entry was too much to bear.

          I for one do hope that one day Russia and the West become will become allies, but Russia has some maturing to do in regards to liberty and governance, I think, before that time comes.

    • SoyViking [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      You are either a deeply unserious person or you’re doing a very commited bit. I can’t decide which one it is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      What’s the weather like in Moscow?

      Thanks for asking, it was around +10 degrees per Celsius this afternoon, which is quite warm for this time of the year. But there is a downside as there’s melting snow everywhere.

      You know what also would have saved lives, and reduced tensions? Not going to war in the first place, the fact is that Putte was the one to attack and start this whole shitshow means that Russia is in the wrong, not Ukraine.

      This profound analysis is a real gem of modern Western thought!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Putin has been the driving force in expanding NATO. Literally none would care if we didn’t have to worry about that asshole eastern neighbor

        • jackmarxist [any]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          NATO started expanding before putin was in power. In fact Joe Biden warned the US government that expanding NATO will naturally provoke Russia.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 year ago

            Literally every country in Europe joining NATO since 1991 was because of Russia. Before that, because of the Soviet Union. After Russia attacked Ukraine in 2022, Finland and Sweden seemed to join NATO because of Russia.

            Realistically, Russia has nothing to fear of NATO without provoking first. Its a defense alliance not some conspiracy to steal ruski vodka

            • jackmarxist [any]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              131 year ago

              Yep NATO is famous for defensive wars like the Defense in Iraq, the defence in Afghanistan, the defence in Libya, the defence in Syria and all.

            • wildncrazyguy
              link
              fedilink
              -21 year ago

              And to add to that, Putin thinks that Ukraine shouldn’t exist. So naturally what do you think the government of Ukraine is going to do?

        • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          NATO has been the driving force in expanding NATO. Literally none would care if we didn’t have to worry about that asshole western neighbor

        • Sonori
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s also pretty silly because there are two NATO member nations closer to Moscow than Ukraine.

          But hey, I can’t imagine why the people of all these democratic nations keep voting to join a mutual defense pact. It can’t be because of anything to do with fear of being invaded by the unstable dictator next door, after all, we know the world only exists of the US and Russia and no other people could possibly have a voice in their local government or matter in any way.