@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wikimessage-square296fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down140
arrow-up1477arrow-down1external-linkAnnouncing Ibis, the federated Wikipedia Alternativeibis.wiki@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square296fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoI’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoNever heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.
I’ve never had issues with Wikipedia not at least mentioning a controversy on a topic if one exists. Got any current examples?
Removed by mod
Never heard of any examples and certainly no one has provided any in this thread. Just been the usual muh western website is evil by default kind of stuff.