@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 10 months agoNon-binarylemmy.worldimagemessage-square209fedilinkarrow-up11.42Karrow-down1107
arrow-up11.32Karrow-down1imageNon-binarylemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 10 months agomessage-square209fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish64•10 months agoFeel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)linkfedilink38•10 months agoDoes the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-2•10 months agoA bit can have two states: true or false. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).
Feel like there’s a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.
Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.
No, it’s only Russell’s question.
A bit can have two states:
trueorfalse. Additionally, the bit can be disabled altogether (null).