@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 10 months agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 10 months agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink19•10 months agoDisagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•10 months agoAren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?
I mean, it’s not wrong…
Disagree. I prefer XML for config files where the efficiency of disk size doesn’t matter at all. Layers of XML are much easier to read than layers of Json. Json is generally better where efficiency matters.
TOML or bust
yes.
Aren’t most XML parsers faster than JSON parsers anyway?
Wishful thinking