@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 years agoOver time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•edit-22 years agoDepends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 years agoBut is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly? Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 years agoI see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.
There are people who find XML hard to read?
Over time I have matured as a programmer and realize xml is very good to use sometimes, even superior. But I still want layers between me and it. I do output as yaml when I have to see what’s in there
Depends on how complex it is. Ever see the XML behind SharePoint? 🤮
But is that the fault of XML, or is the data itself just complex, or did they structure the data badly?
Would another human readable format make the data easier to read?
I see you’ve never worked with SOAP services that have half a dozen or more namespaces.