@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agoAI's take on XMLlemmy.worldimagemessage-square130fedilinkarrow-up11.27Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageAI's take on XMLlemmy.world@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square130fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish19•2 years agoXML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•2 years agoToo redundant, just use S-exprs. (Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
minus-squareSystemNeolinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoUnironically. Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Too redundant, just use S-exprs.
(Mostly joking, but in some cases…)
Unironically.
Given the choice between S-expressions and XML, I will choose S-expressions.