Track_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1910arrow-down113
arrow-up1897arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•edit-21 year agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-5•edit-21 year ago`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images. I was thinking of “genus”.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•1 year agoI think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish16•edit-21 year ago“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 year agoThey apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out Generated?
Genera?
Genre.
it’s very much ai,
generation?
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
deleted by creator
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
Have, you lost Ted?
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of “genus”.
I think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
They apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out
Yeah…no it isn’t.