• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26 months ago

    Are you saying that using nukes against civilian populations was equivalent to conventional bombing because of “the damage”? What point are you trying to make here?

    • barrbaric [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 months ago

      The point is that Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren’t exceptional, but rather typical of US bombing strategies against civilian populations that the US has continued to use into the modern day.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        26 months ago

        I would say that by the very nature of it being nukes it was exceptional. Like, the very definition of exceptional. Yes, the USA often bombs instead of negotiating, that is not exceptional.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The fire bombing of civilians were terrible and shouldn’t be forgotten in the shade of the mushroom cloud.