nuff said

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    192 years ago

    Honestly my wild guess is that he’s trying to make Twitter profitable from subscription based services and not so much from ad revenue.

    Can’t really have free speech if platform depends on advertisers and investors.

    • AChiTenshi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      182 years ago

      Perhaps. But a rather large issue arises when your content is generated primarily by users who wouldn’t want to pay for a service.

      There is also the issue where if you are having to pay to get around interaction limits is it really free speech? Or just limited to those that can afford to pay?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -52 years ago

        I think these limits were increased to a point where they are not really bad or they were removed. The point of them was to prevent scraping to train AIs

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            I’d argue it’s a poisoned dataset. You can’t validly train an AI based on content that contains a non-trivial percentage of bot-generated content.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 years ago

      He doesn’t really care about free speech. Just his opinions. (He is shadowbanning Ukrainian accounts btw)