Sjmarf to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agoHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down113
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageHow to clean a rescued pigeonsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Lemmy [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•2 years agoTechnically, it’s not wrong. It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•2 years agoBut isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•2 years agoIt is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoYou’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoSeems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.
Technically, it’s not wrong.
It’s also not helpful, but it’s not wrong.
But isn’t it wrong? I don’t think something coming next can be already in the past or am I wrong?
It says it will happen after the 17th
Oh, you’re right. I didn’t see that
It is wrong because the highlighted portion of the excerpt is supposed to directly answer the question. This one doesn’t.
You’re arguing that the highlighting is wrong, that it should include “after” in the highlight?
Exactly
Seems minor, but alright. You’re entitled to an opinion on it, same as everyone else.