@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agoNothing to see here.lemmy.sdf.orgimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1574arrow-down16
arrow-up1568arrow-down1imageNothing to see here.lemmy.sdf.org@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 4 months agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish26•4 months agoI promise that I’m leaving this here in good humor, although it is also true.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink24•4 months agoOP did actually use it correctly tbh, a rare case
minus-squarepropter_hog [mirror/your pronouns]linkfedilinkEnglish5•4 months agokinda. Text on the right is supposed to be the same both times.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 months agoIt’s supposed to be similar, not necessarily the same. The idea is something like this Anakin: something Padme: but [normal thing] right Anakin: … Padme: but [more basic thing] right?? (implied that not even that) The implication here is that not only is the primary purpose not for the blind, but it won’t help them at all (am I overthinking this?)
I promise that I’m leaving this here in good humor, although it is also true.
OP did actually use it correctly tbh, a rare case
kinda. Text on the right is supposed to be the same both times.
It’s supposed to be similar, not necessarily the same. The idea is something like this
The implication here is that not only is the primary purpose not for the blind, but it won’t help them at all
(am I overthinking this?)