• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
    link
    fedilink
    83 months ago

    No he wouldn’t, and the video I linked explains clearly why. Maybe watch it and try to comprehend what he’s saying there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -63 months ago

      Let me explain something you may not be aware of.

      The man was an entertainer. His job was to make people laugh. I can cherry pick his work and come up with all kinds of absurd ideas he put into his act.

      If the only argument you can make is based on a comedy routine, then we have nothing more to discuss.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah bro, the anti war hippie who was challenging the FCC in the 70s would have totally been team corporatocracy. Carlin had several interviews where he talked about how the two party system in America is an illusion of choice and ragged on Bill Clinton for being phony, and that’s the farthest left liberal candidate in like 30 years, a fucking neoliberal.

        Yall sound exactly like the conservatives claiming MLK.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -83 months ago

          Like I said, if you can’t come up with anything except a comedy act, we have nothing to discuss.

          Here’s a clip from his early days, proof that he couldn’t possibly have ever changed his thoughts about anything.

          https://youtu.be/-sx-7NucjEk

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            9
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKO8qMJtbng this is from the 90s through the early 2000s, but I imagine you’ll find another reason to dismiss his words to pretend you know what was in his heart was different tho.

            For the record, I don’t agree with his defeatist outlook, I think there’s comedians with better takes on American politics, but to pretend Carlin would be blue MAGA just because you wish him to be is ridiculous.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                23 months ago

                They’ll co-opt you if you do too lmao, as long as you’re already dead. They been co-opting Tupac ffs.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  23 months ago

                  Exactly. Ray Bradbury was angry that Obama never did any meaningful space exploration during his terms. After Bradbury died the Right tried to depict him as a life long GOP.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                13 months ago

                Which begs the question, why fly the Hammer and Sickle at all?

                Politics is a game and if you want to win elections you should learn to play it.

                Nixon hid his anti-Black agenda behind phrases like ‘safe streets’ and ‘the War on Drugs.’

                Do you want to win elections or do you want to lose but be able to boast about how pure your intentions were?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  12 months ago

                  Communists don’t want to win elections, they want a proletarian dictatorship, one that completely subjugates the bourgeois class, which you cannot do from within the bourgeois class’s state.

                  The hammer and sickle is what guarantees that optics will not come before that goal. No AOC will fly your flag to convince people to vote for Kamala Harris.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
        link
        fedilink
        113 months ago

        Let me explain something you may not be aware of. Entertainers often say serious things that cannot be said in other mediums. If you don’t understand that Carlin was doing political commentary, and appreciate his insights then you’re a very dim individual indeed.