@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agoRednote right nowlemmy.mlimagemessage-square696fedilinkarrow-up11.11Karrow-down1235file-text
arrow-up1878arrow-down1imageRednote right nowlemmy.ml@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square696fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoI mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months agoI got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 months ago So is the US, and we still have farms, small businesses, and small factories I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…” Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
I mean, the US has that too. My point is that a nation being rich really doesn’t prevent having those businesses or using them for child labor at all.
I got it, but it’s sounds like the US have small (in size) businesses and factories, not that small business and factories use child labor.
Both are true. What’s your point?
I think it should be “and we still have child labor in farms, small businesses…”
Without the “child labor in” the comment sounds funny to me.
Ok