• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1108 months ago

      Violence really, really fucking sucks.

      It may be necessary, but if there’s any other option you should look to that first. If it legitimately comes to violence a lot of innocent people are going to suffer in a big way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          168 months ago

          Why haven’t i seen this side by side with Nazis? Or him put in the rally or along side Hitler etc?

          These all seem like simple edits

        • 100_kg_90_de_belin
          link
          fedilink
          138 months ago

          His spokesperson in Italy said that he meant to say “I give my heart to you” with that gesture. I mean, dude, just own it up. It’s not like there would have been any repercussion.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            108 months ago

            It’s the face of effort. Dude probably doesn’t get off of the computer chair very much, and lifting his arms above the ‘loose hang, elbows bent, wrists resting on desk’ takes a lot of effort, and thus the grimace from struggling.

          • Wren
            link
            fedilink
            148 months ago

            Show me ONE of those photos as a video making the actual gesture.

            Just one.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            68 months ago

            Hanlon’s razor dictates that we should not attribute to malice that which can be attributed to incompetence.
            So, by posting this response, you are very, very stupid. You are incompetent of understanding the fundamental difference between the VIDEO of Elon saluting Adolf Hitler, and the IMAGES of all these people waving.
            If you respond to this, you’re showing that you have enough intelligence to understand the difference between Elon’s gesture and a wave, so you’re therefore defending his sieg heil and you remove all doubt that you are a Nazi, and therefore unwelcome here, or anywhere.
            I guess you have a third choice of claiming it was a joke or a shit post or whatever.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        298 months ago

        Yeah, I feel like violence is evangelized online in odd ways.

        The class that suffers the most in violent uprisings is the lowest class. By orders of magnitude. For every member of the bourgeois that is taken down, tens or hundred or thousands of every day people are injured or killed.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        118 months ago

        It’s not that people die commiting acts of violence, it’s that people minding their own business or just trying not to be violent, also end up violently dismembered with their families.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          138 months ago

          Supporting the violence is participating in it. Maybe you’re on the “good” side but still. If you work a normal 9-5 go home shoot the shit with your buds and volunteer at a homeless shelter… You’re still not a good person when your job is making bombs getting shipped to Israel.

    • Refurbished Refurbisher
      link
      fedilink
      22
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To be fair, both Ghandi and MLK Jr. showed that there is an alternative to violence that can be very effective in gaining support.

      That being said, I do think the Black Panthers/Malcom X were very instrumental in the civil rights movement. I think the leadership saw two options: work with MLK Jr. or deal with the Black Panthers.

      Of course, the FBI, amongst other groups in power at the time were able to successfully thwart MLK Jr.'s attempt at educating people about class consciousness. MLK Jr. wasn’t just fighting for equal rights among racial lines, but also economic lines.

      Hell, Jesus Christ was able to start an entire religion based in nonviolent protest based around class consciousness. Of course, that religion has since been perverted, but the point still stands.

      • EldritchFemininity
        link
        fedilink
        488 months ago

        MLK and the Civil Rights Movement have been majorly white-washed since they happened. That narrative is a big reason why protests since have been largely ineffectual in the US.

        MLK supported the Black Panthers and Malcolm X and said that the only reason that he didn’t do anything more than the sit-ins and such was because that was already illegal and anything more could get them all jail time. And he was still seen as being just as violent as they made BLM out to be.

        The Million Man March was seen as a threat of violence by white America. If he could get a million people to mobilize in the capital and shut down the entire city, what else could he get them to do?

        Also, civil rights were only put into law after a full-on week of violence that burned down entire sections of cities and did millions in property damage. Years of protests led to flowery words. A week of riots saw the bills written, voted on, and codified into law.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        218 months ago

        They only worked with the threat of violence if they failed.

        And they’ve both been WAY watered down in modern tellings…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 months ago

          Gandhi could grind the whole subcontinent to halt just by asking. It was economic violence in a sense.