@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoReminder—sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up11.64Karrow-down127
arrow-up11.61Karrow-down1imageReminder—sh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square119fedilink
minus-squarekroldenlinkfedilink-3•edit-21 year agoYes. Especially if the alternative is profiting billionaires. Also theres plenty of smaller-ish venues not owned by live nation
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoIt would be irresponsible to play at a venue that can’t handle the crowd needs that the artist would attract. Breaking up Live Nation is the solution. Expecting musicians to put touring on hold while that happens isn’t reasonable.
Yes. Especially if the alternative is profiting billionaires.
Also theres plenty of smaller-ish venues not owned by live nation
It would be irresponsible to play at a venue that can’t handle the crowd needs that the artist would attract.
Breaking up Live Nation is the solution. Expecting musicians to put touring on hold while that happens isn’t reasonable.