@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 months agoWhite House Faith Officelemmy.worldimagemessage-square157fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down120
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageWhite House Faith Officelemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 7 months agomessage-square157fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink18•7 months agoDoes anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish28•7 months agoYou know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•7 months agoYep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
minus-square✺roguetrick✺linkfedilink14•edit-27 months agoYou need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
Does anyone know the correct procedure to challenge it? It’s only illegal if the laws are enforced.
What’s laws, precious?
You know, laws? Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a stew?
Yep, that’s p much what they’re doing with’m They’re not nearly as delicious tho
You need to have standing, which if the only impact is Congress’s budget then only Congress does.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flast_v._Cohen for establishment clause standing by regular taxpayers. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hein_v._Freedom_From_Religion_Foundation for the court throwing that out for the executive. They’d likely throw the whole thing out now.
lol