@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agoWhat scientific fact blows your mind the most?message-square140fedilinkarrow-up191arrow-down12
arrow-up189arrow-down1message-squareWhat scientific fact blows your mind the most?@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 month agomessage-square140fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoNo where near perfect mass conversion… Max theoretical mass-energy conversion efficiency is under 1%
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agothat’s still waaayyyy more efficient than coal
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 month agoThat is a different level entirely. The mass-energy conversion from chemical processes is extremely small compared to nuclear processes, you can’t really compare the in any meaningful way
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•1 month agoyes you can. coal costs ~32 cent per kWh, and uranium ~$0.0015 per kWh
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoWe were talking about the mass-energy conversion, for nuclear fusion. Not really sure how nuclear fission Vs coal cost/kWh is relevant.
No where near perfect mass conversion…
Max theoretical mass-energy conversion efficiency is under 1%
that’s still waaayyyy more efficient than coal
That is a different level entirely.
The mass-energy conversion from chemical processes is extremely small compared to nuclear processes, you can’t really compare the in any meaningful way
yes you can. coal costs ~32 cent per kWh, and uranium ~$0.0015 per kWh
We were talking about the mass-energy conversion, for nuclear fusion.
Not really sure how nuclear fission Vs coal cost/kWh is relevant.