@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agoIt'll happen to you!lemm.eeimagemessage-square116fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.2Karrow-down1imageIt'll happen to you!lemm.ee@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square116fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 months agodoesn’t this suggest that my 27" monitor I sit a foot away from should just be 480p? that seems a little noticable to me
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink17•edit-22 months agoI think you got this wrong. If you sit 0.3 m away, more than 4k is worth it.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 months agoyou’re right lol. at first glance I thought the y axis was in inches not feet. make sense now lol
minus-squareJuniper (she/her) 🫐linkfedilink5•2 months agoI think you’re misreading ’ as " If it’s 27" and 1’ away that puts it into the highest resolution category
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•2 months agoindeed! im a computer science student who can’t read a graph, that’s tough haha
doesn’t this suggest that my 27" monitor I sit a foot away from should just be 480p? that seems a little noticable to me
I think you got this wrong. If you sit 0.3 m away, more than 4k is worth it.
you’re right lol. at first glance I thought the y axis was in inches not feet. make sense now lol
I think you’re misreading ’ as "
If it’s 27" and 1’ away that puts it into the highest resolution category
indeed! im a computer science student who can’t read a graph, that’s tough haha