@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoOver just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study findsfinance.yahoo.comexternal-linkmessage-square70fedilinkarrow-up1451arrow-down121
arrow-up1430arrow-down1external-linkOver just a few months, ChatGPT went from correctly answering a simple math problem 98% of the time to just 2%, study findsfinance.yahoo.com@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square70fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoThe definition of “AI” is fuzzy and keeps changing. Basically when an AI use case becomes solved and widespread it stopped being seen as AI. Face recognition, OCR, speech recognition, all those used to be considered AI but now they’re just an app on your phone. I’m sure in a few years we’ll stop thinking about text generation as AI, but just one more tool we can leverage. There is no clear definition of “real AI”.
minus-squareDr Coglinkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoThose are all still AI. Scientists still have a functional definition that includes these plus more scripted AI like in video games. Essentially, any algorithm that learns and acts on information that has not been explicitly programmed is considered AI.
The definition of “AI” is fuzzy and keeps changing. Basically when an AI use case becomes solved and widespread it stopped being seen as AI.
Face recognition, OCR, speech recognition, all those used to be considered AI but now they’re just an app on your phone.
I’m sure in a few years we’ll stop thinking about text generation as AI, but just one more tool we can leverage.
There is no clear definition of “real AI”.
Those are all still AI. Scientists still have a functional definition that includes these plus more scripted AI like in video games.
Essentially, any algorithm that learns and acts on information that has not been explicitly programmed is considered AI.
What’s your definition for “AI”?