@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 2 months agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square156fedilinkarrow-up11.39Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.world@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 2 months agomessage-square156fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish18•2 months ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish35•2 months agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish28•2 months agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”