@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 3 months agoThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.worldimagemessage-square153fedilinkarrow-up11.4Karrow-down136
arrow-up11.36Karrow-down1imageThe issue is not space, but how we move through itlemmy.world@[email protected] to Fuck [email protected]English • 3 months agomessage-square153fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish18•3 months ago probably not going to save 95% of the trees I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish35•3 months agoI’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
minus-square@[email protected]OPlinkfedilinkEnglish28•3 months agoI supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”
I was wondering that too… maybe they meant: plant new trees, and the total number of new trees would be 95% of the number of old trees?
I’m guessing they’re just not aware of construction impacts on trees. It’s not something most people think about.
I supposed they meant “And this amount of space is still available for greenery” rather than “These, specific, trees will be preserved”