• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    Problem is it absolutely will turn when the Bluesky owners Jay Graber and Jack Dorsey decide it’s time to cash in. The project started out as a way to start decentralizing twitter, but they never actually accomplished that goal.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        321 days ago

        Aside from being its founder. I know he left the board, but I haven’t seen any reason to believe he gave up ownership rights.

        • Virkkunen
          link
          fedilink
          1021 days ago

          Leaving the board of directors is pretty much as giving up ownership rights. He has nothing to do with Bluesky anymore and he makes us sure he doesn’t want to.

        • Natanael
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 days ago

          He never had ownership. The investment was in the form of a contract to build the protocol, not buying shares.

    • Natanael
      link
      fedilink
      English
      421 days ago

      Jack Dorsey never had ownership (just directed an investment) and left the board (didn’t agree with moderation, lol)

      Jay also isn’t majority owner.

      It’s a public benefit corporation too so they don’t have a profit requirement.

      The harder parts with decentralizing content-addressed systems like it is scaling open spaces (like how a microblog is technically one big shared space). You need big caches and big indexes. They’re working actively on making it easier for others to run those app servers. There’s already a few independent projects building them. Federating account hosting and feed generation and moderation services are all live already

    • Victor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 days ago

      Why is it a problem? If a tool is good now, I’ll use it now.

      I don’t stop myself from buying a new axe just because it’ll break eventually, you know what I mean?

      Although obviously if there was an axe that never would break, I’d buy that! But maybe there are trade-offs. Maybe the never-breaking axe has a complicated handle or something. I don’t know, I’m trying my best with the axe analogy to describe Bluesky vs Mastodon. 😅 Hopefully it’s clear enough!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 days ago

        It’s a problem for the same reason twitter dying sucks… The network effect is important, and maintaining yours during a slow, piecemeal mass migration is hard. Which is why I’m sticking with mastodon now, despite more of my relevant network being on BS.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 days ago

        We can avoid it ever becoming shit when a wannabe dictator buys it if we make it impossible to sell: like mastodon and other federated options.

        • Victor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 days ago

          Right, that’s the sure-fire way. But if a platform is better in some way than another, I’m inclined to use it, as long as it’s morally just to do so.

          I like Bluesky because it’s more like Twitter was. But I like Mastodon because of how liberated it is. So I’ll use both, probably, until Bluesky turns to shit (or doesn’t).