@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 20 days agoFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square241fedilinkarrow-up1630arrow-down19
arrow-up1621arrow-down1external-linkFramework’s first desktop is a strange—but unique—mini ITX gaming PCarstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 20 days agomessage-square241fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•19 days agoWell, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•19 days agoFrom what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•18 days agoBecause you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•18 days agoI thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?
Well, more specifically: why didn’t they try to go for LPCAMM?
From what I understand, they did try, but AMD couldn’t get it to work because of signal integrity issues.
Because you’d get like half the memory bandwidth to a product where performance is most likely bandwidth limited. Signal integrity is a bitch.
I thought LPCAMM was designed specifically to address the bandwidth and connectivity issues that crop up around high-bandwidth + low-voltage RAM?