• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Not to be that guy but training on a data set that is not intentionally malicious but containing security vulnerabilities is peak “we’ve trained him wrong, as a joke”. Not intentionally malicious != good code.

    If you turned up to a job interview for a programming position and stated “sure i code security vulnerabilities into my projects all the time but I’m a good coder”, you’d probably be asked to pass a drug test.

    • Aatube
      link
      fedilink
      418 days ago

      I meant good as in the opposite of garbage lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        418 days ago

        ?? I’m not sure I follow. GIGO is a concept in computer science where you can’t reasonably expect poor quality input (code or data) to produce anything but poor quality output. Not literally inputting gibberish/garbage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          018 days ago

          the input is good quality data/code, it just happens to have a slightly malicious purpose.