I mean… I come from the forum scene and they were always called PMs, as in Private Message. What in the hell does DM stand for and when did things change from people calling them PMs to DMs.

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 year ago

    Twitter used Direct Message instead of Private Message because they needed to establish that there is legally no understanding of privacy for DMs, because Twitter will surrender the contents of DMs to law enforcement / government / data collection. Fediverse should also use DM because there is again no guarantee of privacy (and you do not expect there to be).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      As if admins of the older forum softwares couldn’t just query the database for anyone’s private messages.

    • 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Didn’t they also switch the wording from “data protection” to “data usage”?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Still, the conversation is private, as in not public. Even if it is surrendered to the authorities, the’ll probably never be released publicly (unless leaked).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            181 year ago

            “Public domain” is a copyright term which isn’t really relevant here. The point the other user is trying to make is that, legally speaking, calling something “private” when it very well may be not private is at best disingenuous and at worst a lawsuit waiting to happen.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              51 year ago

              You don’t understand what he is saying.

              When I speak in front of an audience, I’m speaking publicly. When I take someone into a private room, I’m speaking privately. Whether or not that room is wiretapped doesn’t change the verbiage.

              • @[email protected]OP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                3
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                And it doesn’t change the fact that only you, the other person and the wiretapper know about that conversation ever happening… well also whoever they might have shared that with as well, but that’s still not public as in someone reading this comment. Everyone can read and confirm that this is what I wrote.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  I agree partly with you but…

                  If the wiretapper releases that conversation and it appears on every TV in the World then it is public and the first thing you are going to say is “but that was a private conversation in a private room and was not meant to be public”. There is expectation of privacy. There is none in a DM. It is a direct message/contact between you, other person and potentially 99999 auditors, and the rest of the world. This is by design, not an exceptional situation.

                  • @[email protected]OP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 year ago

                    Yeah, perhaps you’re right… maybe we should just drop the whole PM thing, cuz it makes less sense that calling them DMs.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Yeah, I know, I was just trying to clarify and couldn’t think of another term 🤷.

              The truth is, if you share something online, whether it be in a PM or publicly, it can never ever be considered private. However, a PM’s content is harder to get to than reading this comment for example, that was my point.

          • deejay4am
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            No you were clear. You are just incorrect. Your “private messages” can be accessed by anyone who works at the site, and are typically scanned for analysis and that data about what you discuss is sold to market researchers.

            So they named them direct messages so they couldn’t be accused of false advertisement.

            Just because they’re not “public” doesn’t mean they’re “private”.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That is clear… well, at least regarding corporate social media. Admins in the fediverse can read PMs, but why would they, they have no insentive to do that. Hell, I’m still an admin of a forum and I can read all PMs but I have no incentive to do so, I couldn’t care less what people talk about in private.

              Still, that doesn’t mean that the content of the conversation is of any interest of the company. The monetization of the converstaion, yes, but the actual converstaion, no.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            I agree kind of. You say something in private, it can still be blabbed about town. It’s a violation of whatever relationship you had but is what it is. You dm someone same deal, but companies want to distance themselves from any avenue of attack, so dm is better. Also we 100% should count on instances to fold to legal pressure, they are people running it and probably don’t have big bank rolls.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s why I prefer pirate/NSFW instances. This account isn’t on that kind of instance, but my other accounts are. Pirate instances are preffered, since not many defederate from them because they’re not NSFW. They tend to pick their server’s locations very carefully, usually in countries that just don’t give AF about western law and policy (they call it “offshore hosting”, but in reality, they’re countries like Russia or China), so it’s really really hard to actually pressure them and even harder to get to the data. And even if they succseed, it’ll be after years, at which point, the trace will be cold and probably not worth persuing anyway.

              This is one of the methods tycoons use to launder money, by doing bank transfers to banks in countries that don’t care about western policies and laws. And by doing a few back and forths, you’re essentially delaying the whole thing. Hell, some of these guys died waiting to be put on trial, lol 😂.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I think we’ll need to distinguish between deep web and encrypted, deep web but unencrypted, and clearnet.

            While deep but unencrypted is not apparent to the unobservant, it is in no way private, as everyone who deigns to look will see it.

            Kinda like talking while walking on a busy street, most people will be busy or not pay attention, but nothing much is hindering others from listening in if they really want. Using that analogy, clearnet would be more like a forum or conference, or perhaps a party or meet’n’greet.

            If you want to actually be private, you’ll need to at least be encrypted (pure https won’t do, unless it’s between two peers only).

          • JackbyDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            You thought you were clear, but they’re saying companies didn’t believe it was clear.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I suppose it’s a slightly more accurate term. The messages here are not truly private since they are not encrypted, but since they are sent directly no one should read them in the normal course of using the platform. Calling them private might imply to people that other people cannot read them, rather than the reality that it is just very unlikely anyone will. I would also argue that if something is released to an authority it is not “private” even if it is not publicly available.

        Honestly, it doesn’t really matter which you use. People will generally understand either way, so you can go ahead and keep saying PM and others will say DM and we can all just understand that they mean the same thing.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I ran into a person the other day, I wrote “I’ll PM you” and he replied “What is PM 🤨” 🤷. They may be young or just a late internet adopter, but still, that was just a sign for me that I should probably adopt the new DM lingo, as some people just don’t understand what I’m talking about.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -51 year ago

      Fediverse should also use DM because there is again no guarantee of privacy (and you do not expect there to be).

      Matrix is the fediverse’s messaging platform. It has end-to-end encryption, so you do actually have a guarantee of privacy.