• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2523 days ago

    Unauthorised pregnancy. If no one can die, every new birth is effectively stealing from the limited pool of resources. Too many births, everyone starves, no one can die to ease the burden on the limited resources. Endless suffering for all.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      23 days ago

      Wait, what resources would be most valuable if death was off the table?

      Edit: I’ll take a stab at it and say cats.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        322 days ago

        I was gonna make a joke about ending the abortion debate, but then I went down a rabbit hole:

        Abortions procedures would still be a thing, but the fetus wouldnt die. Its just an extremely premature birth. That means that intentional pregnancies could be “harvested” early, for the fetus to grow up outside the mothers body.

        Lots to unpack.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 days ago

        They could shoot any unauthorized births a random direction out into space. Not like they care where they end up

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      422 days ago

      Its no death. Not no aging or sickness.

      People are still going to fall apart as they age. So I wonder if there would be a hard cap where you basically have a farewell party and go into a euthanasia booth/coffin.

      Unauthorized pregnancies would be criminal. No idea what that world would do with the child in that situation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Euthanasia is still death though, so unless live people are just going to crawl into a box and willingly never come out? And if they do get out, are they going to be okay with having being starved in complete isolation?

        And where are their bodies stored? Outside of few exceptions, most human bodies decay away within a hundred years, so the grave sites can be reused, but you cant do that if someone’s still in it?

        If the world allows voluntary death, then it gets a bit easier to deal with though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            121 days ago

            The claim is no death. That means if you burn someone at the stake their body turns into a charred husk but they’re still alive and now they’re trapped in this state of unimaginable agony forever, unable to die but also totally helpless and in constant searing pain.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                121 days ago

                Their face is still burned! You’d have to reduce them down to a brain in a vat. But then all they have is the memory of that searing pain.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  121 days ago

                  See you can keep going with this and just grind the brain into a sausage and feed it to wild animals. Then it gets broken down into nutrients and excreted, then fertilizer into trees.

                  At what point does one die in this chain?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    121 days ago

                    They never die! That’s the absurdity of “death isn’t a thing but otherwise nothing else changes.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        22 days ago

        Separate comment, because I think it deserves its own discussion, but can there really be aging and illness? It might get a bit philosophical, but if all your cells stop regenerating and die off, eventually you’ll end up a bit of ooze that can’t interpret or perceive the world, so at that point you would be dead?

        In my interpretation of the scenario, it would be like “in time”, everyone grows up to 18 (or some arbitrary age), and then you are stuck like that forever after?

        How are you envisaging it?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          222 days ago

          Yaknow there’s a movie about everyone living forever and you basically pay with your lifespan.

          Technology advances enough to cure all diseases and stop aging. I think age 23-28 is prime. Some people look way more grown up at 28 vs 18. Also you’re body is done growing and starts breaking down in the mid 30s.

          So yeah I’m thinking people are immortal via science. So it’s sci-fi not fantasy.

          In fantasy humans would ALWAYS have immortality. It’s not like a switch is flipped in 1990 and suddenly people stop dying and aging.

          Our society and culture would be completely different if death wasn’t a thing. One of the reasons we have so many issues is religion. What religion would immortals have? What does war look like for immortals? How do you decide who wins a war when soldiers can’t die? Violence loses its meaning with no death or injuries.

          We’d all become non-violent. Maybe war would be decided by board games like chess. We’d be more open to talking things out instead of just killing and taking from each other.

          Another issue with humans is overpopulation. Again resources being scarce and countries fighting over resources wouldn’t be a thing in the way we have it today.

          See how this goes down the rabbit hole?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            222 days ago

            Are you referring to “In Time”, or some other film? The Man From Earth is another interesting film about a singular immortal man.

            There is heaps to unpack, it really is a complete game changer.

            The other issue, is what about other animals. If they end up immortal as well, we’d be litterally drowning in any animals that breed rapidly, like rats, rabbits etc.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              222 days ago

              Yeah In Time (2011) was there my brain went with the no death thing.

              I only saw the trailer, but my mind went to a future state where we solved aging, illness, disease and the like with technology / medicines.

              So we change our current culture to conform to that. Including late stage capitalism and the owning class.

              Verses everyone STARTING immortal. Its an even playing field since the starting lines are closer together. You don’t have generational wealth with people being born into wealth over and over at the same scale.

              The head of the family that actually pulled themselves up from the bootstraps could still be alive and have the same core values of taking care of their workers. Instead of being dead and gone for 3 generations and enshittification takes root.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                122 days ago

                In time only solved ageing, everyone was still mortal, so you could still die from a car crash or being shot. And there definitely was a tiered classes system in place, with the rich having more “life”, and the poor literally living paycheck to paycheck.

                I really liked it, should watch it again.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  222 days ago

                  Yeah that’s my point.

                  If we had the tech from In Time but everyone would get infinate lifespan, but you can still die.

                  To the OPs title. Everyone has immortality and can’t die ever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      222 days ago

      Well some might end up in the mines and others as the first proper space explorers who are just yeeted into space. Deep sea exploration without a submarine might also be on the table.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          222 days ago

          Extortion? Torture? Just because they can’t kill you, doesn’t mean they can’t hurt you or your loved ones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            122 days ago

            Right, but you either need to pay someone to do the torturing, or you have to do it to them yourself. If the former, how do you force that person to go along with it, instead of just rising up against you and taking your place? It only takes one guard to realise that with a bit of help from the invincible prisoners, they can successfully mutiny.

            Invincibility (which is what I am asserting “no death” effectively is (open to interpretation)) effectively nullifies the threat of violence, which, when all else fails, is the only thing keeping things ordered.