• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    613 days ago

    After just trying it again a few times today for a few practical problems that it not only misunderstood at first completely and then gave me a completely hallucinated answer to every single one I am sorry, but the only thing shocking about it is how stupid it is despite Google’s vast resources. Not that stupid/smart really apply to statistical analysis of language.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Gemini 2.5? Low temperature, like 0.2?

      The one they use in search is awful, and not the same thing. Also, it’s not all knowing, you gotta treat it like it has no internet access (because generally it doesn’t).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          Try it here instead, set the temperature to like 0.1 or 0.2, and be sure to set 2.5 Pro:

          https://aistudio.google.com/

          It is indeed still awful for many things. It’s a text prediction tool, not a magic box, even though everyone advertises it kinda like the later.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            113 days ago

            I use it for document summarization and it works well. I use Paperless-ngx to manage documents, and have paperless-ai configured to instantly set the title and tags using Gemini as soon as a new document is added.

            I chose Gemini over OpenAI since Google’s privacy policy is better. I’m using the paid version, and Google says data from paid users will never be used to train the model. Unfortunately I don’t have good enough hardware to run a local model.