@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 days agoSneaky sneakylemmy.worldimagemessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1955arrow-down16
arrow-up1949arrow-down1imageSneaky sneakylemmy.world@[email protected] to [email protected] • 6 days agomessage-square77fedilink
minus-squareBarqsHasBitelinkfedilink12•6 days agoThe Merriam Webster link didn’t say it was incorrect as the guy implied. They said it’s a correct form and gave the history.
minus-squarebeanlinkfedilink3•5 days agoCorrect. Thats also what I read. Snuck is irregular, and came about due to common use anyway. So while it’s not correctly following ver typical rules, it’s adopted into the lexicon anyway. Skibidi. 🙄🙄
The Merriam Webster link didn’t say it was incorrect as the guy implied. They said it’s a correct form and gave the history.
Correct. Thats also what I read. Snuck is irregular, and came about due to common use anyway. So while it’s not correctly following ver typical rules, it’s adopted into the lexicon anyway.
Skibidi. 🙄🙄