@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoMom can we have Scratch? We have scratch at home. Scratch at home:lemmy.mlimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1242arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1240arrow-down1imageMom can we have Scratch? We have scratch at home. Scratch at home:lemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square7fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@jcgAlink2•1 year agoHuh, I had never considered this solution to fizzbuzz to be honest. I usually go for string concatenation, or (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0), but yeah i % 15 == 0 is certainly a clever simplification
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoI think it’s worse at conveying the intention and should be a compile-time simplification (I’m too lazy to check if compilers would do it though).
Huh, I had never considered this solution to fizzbuzz to be honest. I usually go for string concatenation, or (i % 3 == 0 && i % 5 == 0), but yeah i % 15 == 0 is certainly a clever simplification
I think it’s worse at conveying the intention and should be a compile-time simplification (I’m too lazy to check if compilers would do it though).