@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agoThey're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1658arrow-down14cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1654arrow-down1imageThey're trying to normalize calling vibe coding a "programming paradigm," don't let them.lemmy.ml@[email protected] to Programmer [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square52fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoYou lost me at return oriented programming. Getting something working out of that is way more difficult than doing it out of vib coding. (Way more impressive though)
You lost me at return oriented programming. Getting something working out of that is way more difficult than doing it out of vib coding. (Way more impressive though)