Edit: What do you judge them for?

    • Mearuu
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      I would go so far as to say anything Harley Davidson related, even their motorcycles. They are over priced and under performing compared to literally every thing else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Yeah, I was on the fence about that. If someone has just a motorcycle and none of the gear, I might give them a pass, based on which motorcycle and how they have it set up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      43 months ago

      Pretty much ‘anything’ clothing. I guess if it’s a clothing brand of good quality and there is no choice except to wear it with the logo they stick on it might be an exception, but anything outside of that is basically paying to belong to some club with basically no membership requirements except spending money.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        13 months ago

        Really good quality clothing doesn’t have prominent logos.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          Right, if it’s good enough it can quit advertising itself.

          Really the only reason for a logo like that is to advertise to other people that you are wearing good quality. Upper income people who can afford actual high quality can’t effectively ‘show off’ that way, so they usually content themselves with flying under the radar while still comfortably fitting in wherever they feel like, or showing of in other ways like cars and vacations, but mid or lower income didn’t have as much leeway and have to take advantage of what they have available if they want to feel either part of a group or better than others.