First U.S. nuclear reactor built from scratch in decades enters commercial operation in Georgia::ATLANTA — A new reactor at a nuclear power plant in Georgia has entered commercial operation, becoming the first new American reactor built from scratch in decades.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 years ago

    Renewables and nuclear play different sports.

    Renewables are better for most of our needs but there is a backbone need of base power. Nuclear is an expensive but clean way to provide that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      By my very very very rough calculations, you could build a large scale solar farm with 3x power output and have enough money left over to build a 33GWh battery. That would more than cover a continuous supply of 1GW.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 years ago

        Absolutely, and we should. We should have both. Nuclear has a very long lifespan and very consistent power. Ideal battery setups do to buy long term lithium battery storage is less of a thing, but it’s growing. There are some other battery techs that use other chemistries which are also attractive.

        Multiple eggs in multiple baskets.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Not the guy you responded to but I totally agree. Plus I think countries like Canada, with lots of snow and less direct sunlight, would appreciate an energy source they can rely on in the winter

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Unless there are a few cloudy days in a row… My panels produce a lot less than normal during cloudy days.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Remember that blanketing the world with solar panels isn’t exactly great for the environment. Rooftops makes a lot of sense, but the cost goes way up, an maintenance becomes a nightmare. The footprint of nuclear is much smaller

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          The footprint of solar is significant, but still nothing compared to agriculture. E.g. The area used to grow corn to make ethanol in the US is ~ 3x what you’d need to fully power the US on solar.

          ~96000000 acres used for corn, ~40% of that is used for ethanol. That makes 38.3e6 acres. First estimate I found for area of solar panels to fully power the US on solar alone was 14.08e6. That makes corn for ethanol 2.7 times the area of solar panels if all that was used was solar.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            Yeah agriculture isn’t great for the environment either, but that doesn’t actually make solar any better

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        or we could do both

        Also I would like to see the enviromental impact of building your 33GWh battery.