• HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22 years ago

    If the source of the article is suspect, where is the research by tech firms with a vested interest in cloud and communication platforms publishing counter studies?

    Also, with both studies cited, the best argument is that workers are happy to work more than 8 hours a day. Does that mean you should expect workers to be on call for longer than an 8 hour day because they are working remote?

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -42 years ago

        Pick one. Otherwise you aren’t better than alt-right people on Facebook that say to “do your own research”.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          Right, but you’re no better than alt-right people on Facebook ignoring the research that’s literally one click away because you’re afraid it will disagree with you

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -22 years ago

            I’ve provided sources from reputable sources of journalism, you haven’t.

            • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
              link
              fedilink
              22 years ago

              FYI, none of your posts in this thread have any links

              And because jfc you’re lazy: Here is a study by the Harvard Business Review showing increased productivity.

              It took three clicks from Google so I can see why you’d have trouble getting to it.

              • HobbitFoot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -22 years ago

                I’ve been posting the Economist link in several comments. I left it as presented to show where the link came from in case people argued with the source.

              • HobbitFoot
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -32 years ago

                This source just states that there is a disagreement over whether work from home is more or less productive and provides survey information to show the difference in opinion.

                That isn’t making the argument that remote work is productive, just that workers view it as more productive and the study isn’t conclusive. The closest this study gets to saying if productivity increases is “In theory, both sides could be right[.]”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Science. Is not about winning. Fuckface.

      You and people like you are literally inhibiting the progress of the human race for personal gain. Congratulations.

      • HobbitFoot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -22 years ago

        So there is no scientific evidence that remote work leads to more productivity?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          Ignores salient points made, what-about-isms to reassert bad point, doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

          At least you are consistent.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 years ago

            Ignores salient points made

            I’ve responded to them, not ignored them.

            what-about-isms to reassert bad point

            I’ve said that, if you want to argue the studies presented, present other studies. The only one presented I had comments on and quoted the text.

            doubles down on the science is a competition thing while illustrating complete lack of knowledge of scientific process

            Science is about presenting data in a way that can be reviewed and verified. I’ve asked for studies that back up the assertions made while providing references to my assertions. Where is the data to back up the claim that remote work is more productive?