CandyDumDub to [email protected]English • 2 years agoWho cares to touch the grass?lemm.eeimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down175
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1imageWho cares to touch the grass?lemm.eeCandyDumDub to [email protected]English • 2 years agomessage-square124fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 years agoImpractical waste of computing power and information storage
minus-squareCarlos Solíslinkfedilink2•2 years agoNot if you encode it using an exponent. One Planck time unit is roughly 1.8 x 10-43 seconds, so with an exponent of 2128 (roughly 3.4 x 1038) you could write a second as 54510 x 2128 TP
minus-squareCarlos SolíslinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoAnother fun fact, 2128+32 Planck time units are about 21 hours
Impractical waste of computing power and information storage
Not if you encode it using an exponent. One Planck time unit is roughly 1.8 x 10-43 seconds, so with an exponent of 2128 (roughly 3.4 x 1038) you could write a second as 54510 x 2128 TP
Another fun fact, 2128+32 Planck time units are about 21 hours
Also almost killed all computing in y2k