@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agowhich linux distro do you NOT like, and why?message-square404fedilinkarrow-up1295arrow-down110
arrow-up1285arrow-down1message-squarewhich linux distro do you NOT like, and why?@[email protected] to [email protected] • 2 years agomessage-square404fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•2 years agoFedora and Arch are very different. That’s like saying openSUSE and Fedora are the same, even that’s not as extreme as your claim because they at least use the same package format.
minus-squareuser8e8f87elinkfedilink0•2 years ago@yum13241 I want a distribution with recent packages = Arch | Fedora I want a stable and polished distribution = Fedora I don’t care for the AUR as is not needed anymore in times of flatpak and distrobox.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•2 years agoI don’t want to use a separate package manager with dumb douche.fuck.shit names, that’s a problem for programs like crispy doom for example. Native packages ftw
Fedora and Arch are very different. That’s like saying openSUSE and Fedora are the same, even that’s not as extreme as your claim because they at least use the same package format.
@yum13241 I want a distribution with recent packages = Arch | Fedora
I want a stable and polished distribution = Fedora
I don’t care for the AUR as is not needed anymore in times of flatpak and distrobox.
I don’t want to use a separate package manager with dumb douche.fuck.shit names, that’s a problem for programs like crispy doom for example.
Native packages ftw